IBPS PO English Language Questions with Answers Practice online test 47

Description: free IBPS PO English Language Questions with Answers Practice test 47 for IBPS PO Preliminary and Main online test Prepare bank PO banking mock exams adda

1 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.

A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly $diminished$ if nations cut emi ssi ons of heat-trappi ng greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While gl obal temperatures woul d rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.

"This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century, " sai d NCAR sci enti st Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. "But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize thelimate change", he added.

Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree celsius since the preindustrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, $predominantly$ carbon dioxide. This heattrapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree celsius may be the threshold for dangerous climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emission of carbon $dioxide$ and other greenhouse gases.

To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washington and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm, by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by at most four times that amount, to 2.2 degree celsius above current readings, if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modelling study. Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimetres (about 5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimetres (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summer time would shrink by about a quarter in volume and $stabilize$ by 2100, as $opposed$ to shrinking at least three- quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half
What would be the impact of unchecked greenhouse gas and carbon di oxi de emissions?
A.  The temperature would rise from the current temperature by 2.2 degrees celsius B.    The sea level would rise by about 5.5 inches
C.  The Arctic ice would stabilize by 2100 D.    The Arctic ice would reduce by one fourth
E.    None of these
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
2 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.

A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly $diminished$ if nations cut emi ssi ons of heat-trappi ng greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While gl obal temperatures woul d rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.

"This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century, " sai d NCAR sci enti st Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. "But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize thelimate change", he added.

Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree celsius since the preindustrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, $predominantly$ carbon dioxide. This heattrapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree celsius may be the threshold for dangerous climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emission of carbon $dioxide$ and other greenhouse gases.

To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washington and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm, by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by at most four times that amount, to 2.2 degree celsius above current readings, if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modelling study. Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimetres (about 5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimetres (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summer time would shrink by about a quarter in volume and $stabilize$ by 2100, as $opposed$ to shrinking at least three- quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half
What can be the most appropriate title of the above passage?
A.  A study of the rise in water level B.    A study of the rise in temperatures
C.  A study of the effects of greenhouse gas emissions D.    A study of the Arctic region
E.    A study of change in seasons
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
3 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.

A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly $diminished$ if nations cut emi ssi ons of heat-trappi ng greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While gl obal temperatures woul d rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.

"This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century, " sai d NCAR sci enti st Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. "But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize thelimate change", he added.

Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree celsius since the preindustrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, $predominantly$ carbon dioxide. This heattrapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree celsius may be the threshold for dangerous climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emission of carbon $dioxide$ and other greenhouse gases.

To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washington and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm, by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by at most four times that amount, to 2.2 degree celsius above current readings, if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modelling study. Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimetres (about 5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimetres (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summer time would shrink by about a quarter in volume and $stabilize$ by 2100, as $opposed$ to shrinking at least three- quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half
Which of the following statements is true in context of the passage?
A.  At present the carbon dioxide emission is about 284 ppm B.    The carbon dioxide emissions will be about 450 ppm at the end of this century if unchecked
C.  The carbon dioxide emission was about 380 ppm during the pre-industrial era D.    The carbon dioxide emissions will be about 750 ppm at the end of this century if unchecked
E.    None of these
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
4 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.

A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly $diminished$ if nations cut emi ssi ons of heat-trappi ng greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While gl obal temperatures woul d rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.

"This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century, " sai d NCAR sci enti st Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. "But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize thelimate change", he added.

Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree celsius since the preindustrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, $predominantly$ carbon dioxide. This heattrapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree celsius may be the threshold for dangerous climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emission of carbon $dioxide$ and other greenhouse gases.

To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washington and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm, by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by at most four times that amount, to 2.2 degree celsius above current readings, if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modelling study. Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimetres (about 5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimetres (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summer time would shrink by about a quarter in volume and $stabilize$ by 2100, as $opposed$ to shrinking at least three- quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half
What does the scientist Warren Washington mean when he says, "We could stabilize the threat of climate change"?
A.  Climate change can be stopped completely B.    Climate change can be regularized
C.  Climate change and its effects can be studied extensively D.    The ill-effects of the change in climate can be minimized
E.    None of these
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
5 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.

A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly $diminished$ if nations cut emi ssi ons of heat-trappi ng greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While gl obal temperatures woul d rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.

"This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century, " sai d NCAR sci enti st Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. "But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize thelimate change", he added.

Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree celsius since the preindustrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, $predominantly$ carbon dioxide. This heattrapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree celsius may be the threshold for dangerous climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emission of carbon $dioxide$ and other greenhouse gases.

To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washington and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm, by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by at most four times that amount, to 2.2 degree celsius above current readings, if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modelling study. Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimetres (about 5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimetres (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summer time would shrink by about a quarter in volume and $stabilize$ by 2100, as $opposed$ to shrinking at least three- quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half
Why did Washington and his colleagues conduct a series of studies?
A.  Because, they realised that the temperature increase was almost about 1 degree B.    So that they could stabilise climate change
C.  So that they could help the European Uni on in cutting carbon dioxi de emissions D.    Because they f ound out that the greenhouse gas emissions could be cut by 70%
E.    None of these
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
6 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.

A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly $diminished$ if nations cut emi ssi ons of heat-trappi ng greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While gl obal temperatures woul d rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.

"This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century, " sai d NCAR sci enti st Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. "But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize thelimate change", he added.

Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree celsius since the preindustrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, $predominantly$ carbon dioxide. This heattrapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree celsius may be the threshold for dangerous climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emission of carbon $dioxide$ and other greenhouse gases.

To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washington and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm, by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by at most four times that amount, to 2.2 degree celsius above current readings, if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modelling study. Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimetres (about 5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimetres (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summer time would shrink by about a quarter in volume and $stabilize$ by 2100, as $opposed$ to shrinking at least three- quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half
What would be the impact of holding the carbon dioxide level at 450 ppm at the end of this century?

A. Global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees celsius.

B. Arctic warming could be reduced by half

C. Thermal expansi on will stop completely.
A.  only A B.    only A and B
C.  only B and C D.    All the three A, B and C
E.    None of these
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
7 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.

A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly $diminished$ if nations cut emi ssi ons of heat-trappi ng greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While gl obal temperatures woul d rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.

"This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century, " sai d NCAR sci enti st Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. "But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize thelimate change", he added.

Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree celsius since the preindustrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, $predominantly$ carbon dioxide. This heattrapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree celsius may be the threshold for dangerous climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emission of carbon $dioxide$ and other greenhouse gases.

To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washington and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm, by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by at most four times that amount, to 2.2 degree celsius above current readings, if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modelling study. Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimetres (about 5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimetres (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summer time would shrink by about a quarter in volume and $stabilize$ by 2100, as $opposed$ to shrinking at least three- quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half

Choose the word which is MOST SIMILAR in meaning to the word printed in bold as used in the passage.
$PREDOMINANTLY$
A.  clearly B.    aggressively
C.  mainly D.    first
E.    faintly
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
8 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.

A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly $diminished$ if nations cut emi ssi ons of heat-trappi ng greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While gl obal temperatures woul d rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.

"This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century, " sai d NCAR sci enti st Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. "But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize thelimate change", he added.

Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree celsius since the preindustrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, $predominantly$ carbon dioxide. This heattrapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree celsius may be the threshold for dangerous climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emission of carbon $dioxide$ and other greenhouse gases.

To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washington and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm, by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by at most four times that amount, to 2.2 degree celsius above current readings, if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modelling study. Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimetres (about 5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimetres (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summer time would shrink by about a quarter in volume and $stabilize$ by 2100, as $opposed$ to shrinking at least three- quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half

Choose the word which is MOST OPPOSITE in meaning of the word printed in bold as used in the passage
$OPPOSED$
A.  resistant B.    against
C.  favouring D.    similar
E.    agree
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
9 . Rearrange the following six sentences (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F) in the proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph; then answer the questions given below them.

(A) Further, for opening new branches or shifting branches outside a city, town or village, permission of the Reserve Bank is required.

(B) Before granting licence, Reserve Bank has to be satisfied by inspection or otherwise of the suitability of the company for licence.

(C) The Reserve Bank has the discretion to reject licence or approve the licence on such conditions as it thinks fit.

(D) A company wanting to commence banking business requires prior licence from the Reserve Bank.

(E) Banki ng compani es have to have a minimum capital and reserves as specified in the Banking Regulation Act.

(F) A licence once given may also be cancelled after giving the bank an opporunity to be heard.
Which of the following shold be the FIRST sentence after rearrangement?
A.  A B.    B
C.  C D.    D
E.    E
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
10 . Rearrange the following six sentences (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F) in the proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph; then answer the questions given below them.

(A) Further, for opening new branches or shifting branches outside a city, town or village, permission of the Reserve Bank is required.

(B) Before granting licence, Reserve Bank has to be satisfied by inspection or otherwise of the suitability of the company for licence.

(C) The Reserve Bank has the discretion to reject licence or approve the licence on such conditions as it thinks fit.

(D) A company wanting to commence banking business requires prior licence from the Reserve Bank.

(E) Banki ng compani es have to have a minimum capital and reserves as specified in the Banking Regulation Act.

(F) A licence once given may also be cancelled after giving the bank an opporunity to be heard.
Which of the following should be the SECOND sentence after the rearrangement?
A.  A B.    B
C.  C D.    F
E.    E
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum

© 2017 by IBPSadda . All Rights Reserved | Copyright | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy

Contact us: info@ibpsadda.com