IBPS PO Reasoning Ability Questions with Answers Practice online test 5

Description: free IBPS PO Reasoning Ability Questions with Answers Practice test 5 for IBPS PO Preliminary and Main online test Prepare bank PO banking mock exams adda

1 . Study the following information to answer the given questions.

M, N, O, P, Q, R, S and T are captains of eight different football teams, England, Brazil, Spain, Holland, Hungary, Germany, Chile and Real Madrid but not necessarily in the same order. All of them are seated around a circular table and are facing the centre.

M sits third to the left of the captain of Germany. The captain of Chile, who is not Q, is an immediate neighbour of T. S and T are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between T and the captain of Real Madrid. P is neither the captain nor the immediate neighbour of the Brazilian team. Only two people sit between Q and S. Neither Q nor S is an immediate neighbour of M. Neither Q nor S is the captain of Germany. The captain of Spain sits second to the right of P. P is not an immediate neighbour of M. P is not the captain of Germany and M is not the captain of Spain. The captain of England sits third to the left of R. The captains of England and Germany are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between P and the captain of the Holland team. N is not the captain of Chile.
Who is the captain of the Chile team?
A.  O B.    T
C.  M D.    N
E.    none of these
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
2 . Study the following information to answer the given questions.

M, N, O, P, Q, R, S and T are captains of eight different football teams, England, Brazil, Spain, Holland, Hungary, Germany, Chile and Real Madrid but not necessarily in the same order. All of them are seated around a circular table and are facing the centre.

M sits third to the left of the captain of Germany. The captain of Chile, who is not Q, is an immediate neighbour of T. S and T are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between T and the captain of Real Madrid. P is neither the captain nor the immediate neighbour of the Brazilian team. Only two people sit between Q and S. Neither Q nor S is an immediate neighbour of M. Neither Q nor S is the captain of Germany. The captain of Spain sits second to the right of P. P is not an immediate neighbour of M. P is not the captain of Germany and M is not the captain of Spain. The captain of England sits third to the left of R. The captains of England and Germany are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between P and the captain of the Holland team. N is not the captain of Chile.
P is related to which of the following teams?
A.  Hungary B.    England
C.  Spain D.    Holland
E.    None of these
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
3 . Study the following information to answer the given questions.

M, N, O, P, Q, R, S and T are captains of eight different football teams, England, Brazil, Spain, Holland, Hungary, Germany, Chile and Real Madrid but not necessarily in the same order. All of them are seated around a circular table and are facing the centre.

M sits third to the left of the captain of Germany. The captain of Chile, who is not Q, is an immediate neighbour of T. S and T are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between T and the captain of Real Madrid. P is neither the captain nor the immediate neighbour of the Brazilian team. Only two people sit between Q and S. Neither Q nor S is an immediate neighbour of M. Neither Q nor S is the captain of Germany. The captain of Spain sits second to the right of P. P is not an immediate neighbour of M. P is not the captain of Germany and M is not the captain of Spain. The captain of England sits third to the left of R. The captains of England and Germany are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between P and the captain of the Holland team. N is not the captain of Chile.
Which of the following combinations is definitely true?
A.  T - Hungary B.    Q - Real Madrid
C.  N - Brazil D.    R - Holland
E.    None of these
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
4 . Study the following information to answer the given questions.

M, N, O, P, Q, R, S and T are captains of eight different football teams, England, Brazil, Spain, Holland, Hungary, Germany, Chile and Real Madrid but not necessarily in the same order. All of them are seated around a circular table and are facing the centre.

M sits third to the left of the captain of Germany. The captain of Chile, who is not Q, is an immediate neighbour of T. S and T are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between T and the captain of Real Madrid. P is neither the captain nor the immediate neighbour of the Brazilian team. Only two people sit between Q and S. Neither Q nor S is an immediate neighbour of M. Neither Q nor S is the captain of Germany. The captain of Spain sits second to the right of P. P is not an immediate neighbour of M. P is not the captain of Germany and M is not the captain of Spain. The captain of England sits third to the left of R. The captains of England and Germany are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between P and the captain of the Holland team. N is not the captain of Chile.
Which of the following combinations is false in respect of the given information?
A.  N - Brazil B.    Q - Hungary
C.  O - Chile D.    Data inadequate
E.    None of these
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
5 . Study the following information to answer the given questions.

M, N, O, P, Q, R, S and T are captains of eight different football teams, England, Brazil, Spain, Holland, Hungary, Germany, Chile and Real Madrid but not necessarily in the same order. All of them are seated around a circular table and are facing the centre.

M sits third to the left of the captain of Germany. The captain of Chile, who is not Q, is an immediate neighbour of T. S and T are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between T and the captain of Real Madrid. P is neither the captain nor the immediate neighbour of the Brazilian team. Only two people sit between Q and S. Neither Q nor S is an immediate neighbour of M. Neither Q nor S is the captain of Germany. The captain of Spain sits second to the right of P. P is not an immediate neighbour of M. P is not the captain of Germany and M is not the captain of Spain. The captain of England sits third to the left of R. The captains of England and Germany are not immediate neighbours. Only one person sits between P and the captain of the Holland team. N is not the captain of Chile.
If R is related to Brazil, N is related to Chile, in the same way T is related to which of the following?
A.  Real Madrid B.    Hungary
C.  Spain D.    Chile
E.    England
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
6 . In each question below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer

1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either conclusion I or II follows.
4) if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow.

Statements:

Some cats are kittens.
All dogs are kittens.
No kittens are black.

Conclusions:

I. All kittens being cats is a possibility.
II. Some dogs can never be black.
A.  1 B.    2
C.  3 D.    4
E.    5
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
7 . In each question below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer

1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either conclusion I or II follows.
4) if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow.

Statements:

60% of the government teachers went on strike.
Miss Rani is a government teacher.

Conclusions:

I. That Miss Rani went on strike is a possibility.
II. Miss Rani did not participate in the strike.
A.  1 B.    2
C.  3 D.    4
E.    5
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
8 . In each question below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer

1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either conclusion I or II follows.
4) if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow.

Statements:

All scholars are eccentric.
No woman is eccentric.
All eccentrics are studies.

Conclusions:

I. No woman is a scholar.
II. All studies being scholar is a possibility.
A.  1 B.    2
C.  3 D.    4
E.    5
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
9 . In each question below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer

1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either conclusion I or II follows.
4) if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow.

Statements:

Some eggs are hard-boiled.
No eggs are uncrackable.

Conclusions:

I. Some hard-boiled are uncrackable.
II. No hard-boiled are uncrackable.
A.  1 B.    2
C.  3 D.    4
E.    5
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum
10 . In each question below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer

1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either conclusion I or II follows.
4) if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow.

Statements:

Some perfumes reek badly.
All perfumes are expensive.
All expensive things are unique.

Conclusions:

I. There is a possibility that all unique things are perfumes.
II. Unique things can never reek badly.
A.  1 B.    2
C.  3 D.    4
E.    5
explanation View Answer notepad Workspace report-error Report discuss Discuss in Forum

© 2017 by IBPSadda . All Rights Reserved | Copyright | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy

Contact us: info@ibpsadda.com